The study of politeness and impoliteness in cyberpragmatics has expanded alongside the growth of digital communication, revealing that online environments fundamentally reshape face management, identity construction, and social negotiation. Existing research shows increasing awareness that digital interaction is not merely an extension of face-to-face communication but a distinct pragmatic space shaped by technological mediation, multimodality, and platform design. However, despite this progress, the field remains uneven, with several conceptual, empirical, and methodological gaps that limit a comprehensive understanding of (im)politeness in online interaction.
Major research gaps persist in underexplored domains such as synchronous voice-based communication (e.g., gaming voice chat), multimodal resources (emojis, visual design), digital silence as a pragmatic strategy, and the cognitive processing of politeness cues under conditions of reduced context and divided attention. Additionally, limited attention has been given to platform-specific affordances, specialized digital communities, longitudinal change in politeness norms, and systematic cross-platform or cross-cultural comparison. These gaps indicate that much of current cyberpragmatic research remains text-centric, cross-sectional, and insufficiently sensitive to technological and temporal dynamics.
Theoretical contributions in the field largely involve adapting and extending Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory to digital contexts, demonstrating its continued relevance while exposing its limitations. Scholars have integrated politeness theory with cyberpragmatics to account for altered temporalities, reduced non-verbal cues, public visibility, and permanent records of interaction. Further advances include third-wave pragmatic approaches that conceptualize politeness as an emergent, community-based practice; multimodal frameworks that foreground visual and design elements; and the reconceptualization of impoliteness as a strategic resource, captured in notions such as “e-mpoliteness.”
Novel contributions and methodological innovations have expanded the scope of cyberpragmatic inquiry beyond text. These include analyses of paralinguistic cues in voice chat, the role of sense of presence in virtual environments, digital silence as meaningful absence, and the transformation of politeness norms in crisis situations. Emerging research on human–chatbot interaction, digital health applications, machine translation of politeness markers, and algorithm-driven performative impoliteness further demonstrates how technological systems actively shape pragmatic behavior and social meaning in online spaces.
Overall, cyberpragmatic politeness research is a field in active theoretical and empirical development. Its most significant contribution lies in recognizing that politeness in digital contexts is technologically constituted, multimodal, culturally situated, and dynamically negotiated over time. Future research must move beyond static, text-based analyses toward longitudinal, comparative, and multimodal approaches that foreground platform affordances, algorithmic logics, and evolving community norms, thereby advancing a more comprehensive and theoretically robust understanding of (im)politeness in digital communication.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar