Official INAPRA youtube Channel & website

 

YouTube channel INAPRA https://www.youtube.com/@pragmaticsdiscussionforum-1790/videos  dan web INAPRA berisi metadata rekaman acara PDF 

https://www.inapra.org/p/kompilasi-video-webinar-pdf.html

DISKUSI ONLINE INAPRA-PDF SERIES #20

 DISKUSI ONLINE INAPRA-PDF SERIES #20

Dear All INAPRA-PDF-LOVERS

INAPRA & Pragmatics Discussion Forum Proudly Presents

DISKUSI ONLINE INAPRA-PDF SERIES #20: 

"Refusal to Request: Studi Empiris terhadap Penolakan Ekspresi Perasaan Cinta di Kalangan Remaja Jawa"

PEMBICARA:

Dr. Drs. Edy Jauhari. M.Hum., Universitas Airlangga

Dr. Miftah Nugroho, M.Hum., Universitas Sebelas Maret

MODERATOR: 

Eka Margianti Sagimin, S.S., M.Pd., Universitas Pamulang

Pada Hari Sabtu, 28 Januari 2022, JAM 09.00-11.30

VIA ZOOM for 100 seats.

INAPRA Members will get free Access to this Webinar dan E-Certificate. 

For Non-INAPRA members for the-Certificate, the donation is Rp. 25,000,-

IMPORTANT NOTE:

E-Certificate is given ONLY for registered participants with full attendance and Donation.

Bank Account Number For Non-INAPRA members:  135-111-6463

Bank Name:     Bank BNI 46, Account Name:  Rahmanti Asmarani

Registrasi Gratis ke:

https://tinyurl.com/registrasiPDF20

Narahubung: Dian Rianita (0812-6628-233)

Impoliteness strategies

Impoliteness strategies
Culpeper J

Springer International Publishing, (2016), 421-445
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_16
47Citations
100Readers
Add to libraryGet full text

Abstract

The “impoliteness strategy”, a kind of parallel to the “politeness strategy”, has dominated research for decades and is still current. However, the notion of a “strategy” is poorly understood and rarely defined. This chapter begins by critically examining this notion, as it is used in linguistics. It argues that in politeness studies it has been overly focused on the idea of a rational linguistic means of achieving certain ends or goals. That a strategy might also involve the coordination of communication through routine and shared linguistic means that are recognised within particular communities seems to have been largely overlooked. The next part of this chapter outlines Culpeper’s (1996) taxonomy of impoliteness strategies, and follows with a critical review. It notes that most problems and controversies lie at the more abstract level of the “superstrategy”. Two particularly controversial areas are discussed. One is the relationship between directness and impoliteness strategies, and especially whether there is some correlation with the degree of offence caused. The other is the relationship between impoliteness strategies and context. The final part of the chapter outlines a more recent bottom-up framework of impoliteness strategies or triggers, and one that, echoing Terkourafi’s (e.g., 2001) work on politeness, places impoliteness conventionalized for particular contexts of use at the centre.

LIST ANGGOTA INAPRA BATCH 2

LIST ANGGOTA INAPRA BATCH 2

1.   I Made Suta Paramarta --Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Singaraja, Bali: NRA.2023.INAPRA.B02.0117

2.   Eky Kusuma Hapsari, S.S., M.Hum. --Universitas Negeri Jakarta:NRA.2023.INAPRA.B02.0118

3.   Monika Widyastuti Surtikanti     Universitas Katolik Santo Agustinus Hippo:NRA.2023.INAPRA.B02.0119

LIST PENDAFTAR KEANGGOTAAN INAPRA BATCH 1

 LIST PENDAFTAR KEANGGOTAAN INAPRA BATCH 1 SESUAI DENGAN LIST 

di https://www.inapra.org/p/daftar-anggota-pdf.html

LIST PENGURUS INAPRA

1. Jumanto Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

2. Hanafi Universitas Andalas

3. Faizal Risdianto UIN Salatiga

4. Eka Margianti Sagimin Universitas Pamulang

5. Rahmanti Asmarani Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Semarang

6. Dian Rianita Universitas Lancang Kuning

7. Budi Purnomo Universitas Surakarta