Manfaat menjadi anggota IPrA (International Pragmatics Association)

 

Berikut poin-poin benefit atau manfaat menjadi anggota IPrA (International Pragmatics Association) yang relevan untuk disampaikan dalam konteks rencana penggabungan keanggotaan Ina-PrA dengan IPrA:

🎓 Manfaat Akademik & Ilmiah

1. Akses ke publikasi ilmiah utama

Sebagai anggota, Anda mendapatkan akses online ke jurnal Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication, publikasi inti IPrA yang mencakup isu-isu terbaru dalam bidang pragmatik (sekitar 600 halaman per tahun).

2. Kesempatan kontribusi ilmiah

Anggota mempunyai hak untuk mengajukan abstrak dan mempresentasikan makalah dalam International Pragmatics Conferences (konferensi ilmiah dua tahunan IPrA).

3. Hak berpartisipasi dalam kehidupan asosiasi

Termasuk hak memilih dalam keputusan asosiasi, menominasikan kandidat untuk dewan konsultatif, serta co-nominate untuk penghargaan John J. Gumperz Lifetime Achievement Award.

4. Akses ke komunitas dan blog IPrA

Anggota boleh memposting di blog komunitas IPrA serta menjalin komunikasi dengan peneliti lain di jaringan global.

📚 Benefit Tambahan untuk Pengembangan Profesional

5. Diskon untuk sumber daya linguistik dan jurnal lain

Diskon khusus untuk pembelian atau langganan Handbook of Pragmatics, Bibliography of Pragmatics, serta sejumlah jurnal linguistik dari penerbit internasional seperti John Benjamins, Cambridge University Press, De Gruyter Mouton, Routledge, dan lainnya.

6. Akses ke Members Only Area

Area anggota di situs IPrA memberikan akses lebih luas pada dokumen internal, laporan komite, nominasi, dan prosedur pemilihan yang hanya tersedia bagi anggota terdaftar.

🌍 Networking & Eksposur Internasional

7. Jaringan global peneliti pragmatik

Bergabung dengan komunitas internasional yang aktif melintas benua, memfasilitasi kolaborasi riset, kerjasama akademik, dan pertukaran ide di bidang pragmatik.

8. Peluang kolaborasi melalui konferensi dan publikasi

Partisipasi dalam konferensi IPrA dan publikasi jurnal membuka peluang sinergi lintas disiplin serta visibility ilmiah di panggung internasional.

📈 Keunggulan Profesional

9. Meningkatkan profil akademik/profesional

Keanggotaan IPrA diakui secara internasional di bidang linguistik pragmatik — hal ini dapat memperkuat CV, portofolio riset, dan kredibilitas akademis/penelitian anggota.

---

✅ Catatan: 

Keanggotaan bersifat tahunan dan diperlukan pembaruan setiap kalender tahun (1 Jan–31 Des). Manfaat penuh hanya berlaku saat keanggotaan aktif.

Inilah rangkuman manfaat utama yang bisa digunakan untuk menilai dan menjelaskan Kenapa berinvestasi dalam keanggotaan IPrA bisa bernilai bagi anggota Ina-PrA, baik dari perspektif akses ilmiah, jejaring profesional, maupun pengembangan diri secara akademik.

Gaps, Theoretical Contributions, and Novelty in Politeness/Impoliteness Research in Cyberpragmatics Chat

The study of politeness and impoliteness in cyberpragmatics has expanded alongside the growth of digital communication, revealing that online environments fundamentally reshape face management, identity construction, and social negotiation. Existing research shows increasing awareness that digital interaction is not merely an extension of face-to-face communication but a distinct pragmatic space shaped by technological mediation, multimodality, and platform design. However, despite this progress, the field remains uneven, with several conceptual, empirical, and methodological gaps that limit a comprehensive understanding of (im)politeness in online interaction.

Major research gaps persist in underexplored domains such as synchronous voice-based communication (e.g., gaming voice chat), multimodal resources (emojis, visual design), digital silence as a pragmatic strategy, and the cognitive processing of politeness cues under conditions of reduced context and divided attention. Additionally, limited attention has been given to platform-specific affordances, specialized digital communities, longitudinal change in politeness norms, and systematic cross-platform or cross-cultural comparison. These gaps indicate that much of current cyberpragmatic research remains text-centric, cross-sectional, and insufficiently sensitive to technological and temporal dynamics.

Theoretical contributions in the field largely involve adapting and extending Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory to digital contexts, demonstrating its continued relevance while exposing its limitations. Scholars have integrated politeness theory with cyberpragmatics to account for altered temporalities, reduced non-verbal cues, public visibility, and permanent records of interaction. Further advances include third-wave pragmatic approaches that conceptualize politeness as an emergent, community-based practice; multimodal frameworks that foreground visual and design elements; and the reconceptualization of impoliteness as a strategic resource, captured in notions such as “e-mpoliteness.”

Novel contributions and methodological innovations have expanded the scope of cyberpragmatic inquiry beyond text. These include analyses of paralinguistic cues in voice chat, the role of sense of presence in virtual environments, digital silence as meaningful absence, and the transformation of politeness norms in crisis situations. Emerging research on human–chatbot interaction, digital health applications, machine translation of politeness markers, and algorithm-driven performative impoliteness further demonstrates how technological systems actively shape pragmatic behavior and social meaning in online spaces.

Overall, cyberpragmatic politeness research is a field in active theoretical and empirical development. Its most significant contribution lies in recognizing that politeness in digital contexts is technologically constituted, multimodal, culturally situated, and dynamically negotiated over time. Future research must move beyond static, text-based analyses toward longitudinal, comparative, and multimodal approaches that foreground platform affordances, algorithmic logics, and evolving community norms, thereby advancing a more comprehensive and theoretically robust understanding of (im)politeness in digital communication.

Kerangka teori prinsip politeness dan impoliteness dalam cyberpragmatics

Kerangka teori prinsip politeness dan impoliteness dalam cyberpragmatics mengadaptasi teori klasik pragmatics ke komunikasi digital, di mana fitur platform seperti anonimitas dan multimodalitas memengaruhi interpretasi makna.

​Kerangka Teori Utama

Cyberpragmatics, yang dikembangkan oleh Francisco Yus, merupakan cabang pragmatics yang mempelajari pembentukan makna dalam komunikasi berbasis internet dengan lensa teori relevansi Sperber & Wilson. Teori politeness Brown & Levinson (1987) menjadi fondasi, di mana politeness melibatkan strategi mitigasi face-threatening acts (FTA) melalui positive politeness (solidaritas) dan negative politeness (otonomi), sementara impoliteness ala Culpeper (1996, 2011) melibatkan serangan langsung atau sarkasme terhadap face lawan bicara. Leech's politeness maxims (tact, generosity, approbation, modesty, agreement, sympathy) juga diadaptasi untuk menganalisis pelanggaran norma kesopanan di media sosial.

Landasan Teori dalam Cyberpragmatics

Dalam cyberpragmatics, politeness menjadi relational work yang dinegosiasikan melalui affordances digital seperti emoji, GIF, dan like button untuk mengkompensasi kurangnya isyarat nonverbal, sehingga mengurangi FTA. Impoliteness sering meningkat karena anonimitas dan jarak emosional, menghasilkan strategi seperti bald-on-record insults, sarcasm, atau dogpiling di komentar Instagram, sebagaimana terlihat pada studi netizen Indonesia. Landasan ini menekankan konteks platform-spesifik, di mana norma netiquette dan multimodalitas menentukan apakah ujaran dianggap sopan atau kasar.

Ambiguitas hingga intensionalitas dalam kerangka Near-side pragmatics dan Far-side pragmatics

 Berikut penjelasan ambiguitas hingga intensionalitas dalam kerangka Near-side pragmatics dan Far-side pragmatics secara jelas, runtut, dan mudah dipahami.

Near-side pragmatics berfokus pada bagaimana konteks membantu menentukan “apa yang sebenarnya dikatakan” secara literal, sedangkan far-side pragmatics berfokus pada apa yang dilakukan dan disiratkan “melampaui” apa yang dikatakan itu sendiri. Dalam perjalanan dari ambiguitas menuju intensionalitas, keduanya membentuk satu kontinua: dari pemilahan makna literal yang meragukan sampai penafsiran niat komunikatif yang lebih dalam.scirp+3​

Near-side pragmatics dan ambiguitas

• Near-side pragmatics menangani persoalan teknis seperti penyelesaian ambiguitas (lexical, struktural), ke-vague-an, referensi kata ganti, nama diri, deiksis, serta sebagian aspek presuposisi.plato.stanford+2​

• Di sini, konteks dipakai untuk menentukan proposisi literal: misalnya kalimat “I saw a star” harus diputuskan apakah merujuk ke bintang di langit atau selebriti, sehingga ambiguitas dipersempit sebelum makna implikatif dibahas.study+1​

Far-side pragmatics dan intensionalitas

• Far-side pragmatics mengurus apa yang terjadi setelah “apa yang dikatakan” sudah ditetapkan: jenis tindak tutur apa yang dilakukan, implikatur apa yang timbul, dan bagaimana sikap, keyakinan, serta tujuan penutur dibaca dari ujaran.john.jperry+2​

• Di ranah ini, intensionalitas (keterarahan ujaran pada maksud komunikatif tertentu) menjadi pusat analisis: penafsir berupaya merekonstruksi niat, sikap, dan tujuan penutur di balik bentuk linguistik yang sudah tidak ambigu secara literal.onlinelibrary.wiley+1​

Dari ambiguitas ke intensionalitas

• “Dari ambiguitas hingga intensionalitas” menggambarkan lintasan interpretasi: pertama-tama penyimak menyelesaikan ambiguitas dan menentukan proposisi literal (tugas near-side), lalu beralih menafsirkan niat, implikatur, dan efek tindak tutur (tugas far-side).vdu+2​

• Ambiguitas bisa juga digunakan secara sengaja (intentional ambiguity) sebagai strategi pragmatik: penutur sengaja mempertahankan multi-makna untuk mencapai tujuan kesantunan, persuasi, atau humor, sehingga transisi dari bentuk ambigu ke pembacaan niat menjadi titik krusial antara near-side dan far-side pragmatics.ijlll+2

Prof Jumanto getting along with Michael Haugh, Brown & Levinson

The 19th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA 2025) was successfully held at the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, from 22 to 27 June 2025. The conference brought together scholars, researchers, and practitioners from around the world to discuss the latest developments in pragmatics—the study of language in use and communication in social contexts. With the theme focused on language, interaction, and global diversity, the event featured keynote lectures, plenary sessions, panel discussions, workshops, and hundreds of parallel paper presentations covering areas such as discourse analysis, conversation analysis, sociopragmatics, intercultural communication, applied linguistics, cognitive pragmatics, and new directions in pragmatics research. 

The conference served not only as a forum to present cutting-edge research, but also as an international networking hub that fostered interdisciplinary collaboration between academics, educators, and graduate students. Participants also enjoyed various cultural and academic exchange activities, including campus tours and an official conference reception showcasing Australian hospitality. The success of IPrA 2025 reaffirmed the conference’s role as a major global platform for advancing the understanding of language in real-world interaction.

Prof Jumanto, the President of Indonesian Pragmatics Association was getting along with Brown & Levinson.

Prof Jumanto, the President of INa-Pra was getting along with Michael Haugh, the President of IPrA (International Pragmatics Association).

The Profile of Dr. Saira Kazmi, Ph.D.

Dr. Saira Kazmi, Ph.D. is a Pakistani linguist and communication scholar recognized for her contributions to media discourse and critical linguistics. She currently serves as a Visiting Assistant Professor at Riphah International University and Quaid-i-Azam University, both located in Islamabad, Pakistan. Over the years, she has established herself as an active academic and researcher whose work bridges linguistics, media studies, and discourse analysis within both local and international contexts.

Dr. Kazmi obtained her Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Linguistics with a specialization in Media Discourse from the Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM). Her doctoral research and subsequent academic pursuits have focused on the study of language, power, and ideology in news and public communication. Her scholarly interests cover a wide range of areas including Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), Attitude and Appraisal Analysis, and the linguistic representation of social realities in media and public discourse.

Beyond her teaching and research roles, Dr. Kazmi is deeply engaged in editorial and reviewing activities across multiple international journals. She is an active reviewer for the Journal of Linguistics, Culture and Communication (JOLCC) and also collaborates with several academic platforms and journals such as the Parole Journal of Linguistics and Education, the Register Journal (UIN Salatiga, Indonesia), and INSPAD – Institute of Peace and Development. Her editorial and reviewing work reflects her commitment to advancing the quality of linguistic and communication research, particularly within South Asia’s scholarly community.

In addition to her university and journal affiliations, Dr. Kazmi maintains a professional presence within several regional and global organizations. She has been recognized by ScienceFather, an international research organization, as one of the Best Researcher Award recipients in the field of Politics and Media (ScienceFather Profile). Her published and ongoing works often explore issues of cross-cultural communication, linguistic identity, and the interplay between discourse, politics, and gender.

Dr. Kazmi’s digital researcher identifiers further attest to her active engagement in scholarly publishing. Her Scopus Author ID is 57211395994, and her ORCID ID is 0000-0003-1306-8381. She can also be contacted through her academic email address, saira.asad2011@gmail.com, which is cited in several publications and news features (Nation, 2025).

While some publicly available sources have mentioned her involvement with organizations such as Elsevier BV, Better Morrow Magazine, and South Asia Magazine, these affiliations have not yet been independently verified through formal institutional records. Nonetheless, her confirmed roles in Pakistani and Southeast Asian academic institutions highlight her as a key emerging figure in critical linguistics, media studies, and cross-cultural communication research in the region.

The Profile of Prof. Dr. Drs. JUMANTO, M.Pd. Ina-PrA President

 

Prof. Dr. Drs. JUMANTO, M.Pd. 

Ina-PrA President

Prof. Dr. Drs. Jumanto (commonly known simply as Jumanto) earned his Doctorate (PhD) in Linguistics from Universitas Indonesia in 2006. He is a Professor of Humanities, specializing in English Language Teaching (ELT) and Linguistics (Pragmatics), teaching at graduate and postgraduate levels since 1992.

His latest appointment is as Director of the Center of Excellence (CoE) at Universitas Dian Nuswantoro (UDINUS). From 2016 to 2021, he served as Head of the English Department, Faculty of Humanities, UDINUS, Indonesia.

As a Professor of Humanities, his research interests include ELT, pragmatics, discourse analysis, semiotics, translation practices, Cross-Cultural Understanding (CCU), Cross-Cultural Misunderstanding (CCmU or cultural shock), and verbal and nonverbal communication. He is currently working on projects including (1) Discourse, Context, and Text; (2) Distant and Close Language in the Indonesian context as well as within English-speaking interpersonal contexts; and (3) Character Language Projects, especially focusing on Indonesian, Javanese, and English languages.

For his academic records and identifiers, see:

1. Scopus ID: 57200086067

2. Google Scholar profile: Jumanto on Google Scholar Google Scholar

3. UDINUS staff profile (with NIDN, email, etc.): Prof. Dr. Drs. Jumanto – UDINUS Portal portal.dinus.ac.id

4. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0963-8970

PegiatJurnal.com: List Jurnal Terindeks SCOPUS Bidang Linguistics, E...

PegiatJurnal.com: List Jurnal Terindeks SCOPUS Bidang Linguistics, E...: Yang pernah S3 di Indonesia atau yang sekarang sedang S3 di Indonesia sedikit banyak terkena kewajiban ini. Dorongan yang masif dan terkesan...

COMMUNICATIVE FUNCTIONS AND DELIVERANCE STRATEGIES OF WANGSALAN IN JAVANESE SONG LYRICS

COMMUNICATIVE FUNCTIONS AND DELIVERANCE STRATEGIES OF WANGSALAN IN JAVANESE SONG LYRICS

I Dewa Putu Wijana

Faculty of Cultural Sciences Gadjah Mada University

putu.wijana@ugm.ac.id

Abstract

This study deals with wangsalan found in Javanese song lyrics with attention focus on their communicative functions and deliverance strategies. By using very small amount of data of Javanese songs exploiting wangsalan, it is found that this traditional formula are mainly functioned to convey directive, expressive, and representative functions, and seems not specifically be used to express commisive, question, and let alone declaration functions. Declarative functions are exploited to convey command, advice, and prohibition. There are various strategies used by the speakers in exploiting wangsalan. Those are implicit, direct, indirect, literal, and expressed strategies. Explicit, non-literal, and implied strategies are rarely used because they will unease the addressee comprehend the intention formula.

Key terms: wangsalan, traditional formula, communicative function, and deliverance strategy

Full source: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DvyYtyeDEOdD3vjZsKNNLTwWwoBeTtuq/edit

Analysis Model in Critical Pragmatics

 Analysis Model in Critical Pragmatics 

Ramdan Sukmawan, Dadang Suganda , Nani Darmayanti, Muhamad Adji

Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia

Email: ramdan18001@mail.unpad.ac.id

ABSTRACT

Pragmatics examines human language use. The study in pragmatics continues to develop by involving other fields of science, that Cummings (2005) mentions pragmatics in multidisciplinary scope. The study is not only limited to micropragmatics but also in macropragmatics that concerns to language use in sociocultural (Chen, 2020, p. 10). The studies of pragmatics keep exploring in teaching academic writing (Harwood & Hadley, 2004), ESL of classroom talk in a High School (Talmy, 2010), and discursive power and dominance (Melefa et al., 2014). The studies are called critical pragmatics. The critical pragmatics studies try to investigate language use not only in what it is but in what language it is as well. The paper aims at describing analysis models in critical pragmatics. The research methodology applied descriptive qualitative to comprehend the use of analysis models. Analysis model in critical pragmatics applied analysis approach which combined pragmatics study and other study, they are (1) pragmatics, critical pragmatics, and critical in English for Academic Purposes (EAP), (2) conversation analysis (CA) and Fairclough critical discourse analysis (CDA), (3) analysis critical pragmatics in the framework of Fairclough critical discourse analysis (CDA), (4) pragmatics and critical discourse analysis (CDA), (5) critical discourse analysis (CDA) and pragmatics, and (6) critical issues in language use in works of pragmatic phenomena to find ideology. 

Keywords: analysis, critical pragmatics, models

https://conference.inapra.org/index.php/conference/article/view/17

IMRAD, synthesis, and hedging within expert academic writing to encourage a world discussion platform

IMRAD, synthesis, and hedging within expert academic writing to encourage a world discussion platform

Jumanto Jumanto, Dwi Eko Waluyo, Aris Puji Purwatiningsih, Pulung Nurtantio Andono, Raden Arief Nugroho, Ismarita Ramayanti, Asnul Dahar Bin Minghat

Abstract

This paper examines IMRAD, synthesis, and hedging within expert academic writing to encourage a world discussion platform and to enhance manuscript writing for internationally reputable journals. The research utilized 25 Quartile-1 Scopus-indexed articles from 25 scholarly journals from 2022 and 2023 publications across different subject areas. Through online searching, observation, and interpretive techniques, the patterns of IMRAD, its synthesis, and the use of hedging within the synthesis were analyzed and identified as crucial elements for creating a manuscript that serves as a world discussion platform. Based on the systematic observation and interpretation of the 25 data sources, the research findings were discussed across three aspects: the IMRAD pattern, synthesis, and hedging. The findings revealed that symmetrical IMRAD patterns were rarely employed by authors of Quartile-1 Scopus-indexed journals, with various patterns being applied and the largest proportion focusing on different aspects. Synthesis was utilized by all authors of the 25 journal articles, and hedging or cautious language was used by most authors. Authors worldwide may benefit from the results of this research when writing manuscripts to be submitted to internationally reputable journals. Additionally, academic writing teachers can use the proposed interpretive model and research results to teach expert academic writing to their students, thus enhancing the quality of student academic writing and enabling the publication of their papers in internationally reputable journals.

Keywords

academic writing; cautious language; interpretive model; world discussion place; Scopus

Source: https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SiELE/article/view/34776

Unspoken evaluation of impoliteness: The Javanese linguistic interaction example

Unspoken evaluation of impoliteness: The Javanese linguistic interaction example
Norwanto Norwanto | Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga

This study aims at examining the evaluation of impoliteness not manifested in utterances or actions. The focus is on how speaker-hearers conceal their negative evaluation and the reasons underlying their behavior. The data were collected from a WhatsApp group conversation, from a Focus Group discussion with WhatsApp group members, and through questionnaires. The study approaches the data using relational work and rapport management theories. The study shows that hearers conceal the evaluation of impoliteness by affiliating with the topics evaluated positively instead of negatively evaluated utterances. The behavior can cause contested meanings of unmarked utterances between the hearers and the speakers. Although speakers perceive their utterances as politic or appropriate, the hearers observe them negatively. Furthermore, the Focus Group discussion showed that the WhatsApp Group members conducted the unspoken evaluation of impoliteness to maintain the equanimity of social relationships. The questionnaires indicated that concealing negative evaluation is a recurrent action of native speakers of Javanese.

Keywords: unmarked utterances/actions, relational work, im/politeness, rapport management, Javanese language

Politeness and Camaraderie: How Types of Form Matter in Indonesian Context

 Politeness and Camaraderie: How Types of Form Matter in Indonesian Context

Jumanto

Abstract

This article is about politeness and camaraderie through pragmatic viewpoints within Indonesian context. A language, the writer argues, should be directed to politeness (distant language) and camaraderie (close language), the two varieties of language use in some diglossic speech situation. The writer’s arguments are, among others, that distant language is formal, indirect, and non-literal, and that close language is informal, direct, and literal. Distant language is spoken to hearers with power factor, while close language is spoken to hearers with solidarity factor. Ignorance or incompetence of this may cause impoliteness, i.e. rude situations or awkward situations in interpersonal interactions. This tendency elaborates pragmatic viewpointsfrom Goffman’spositive and negative face [1], Brown and Levinson’s positive and negative politeness strategies[2], Renkema’s solidarity and respect politeness[3],Jumanto’s friendship and politeness[4],[5], and types of hearer elaborated by Brown and Gilman[6]and advocated by Jumanto[5]. Examples in the Indonesian language, based on a simple emic research, are given to support the everyday-use-of-Indonesian-language arguments. 

Keywords: Politeness; camaraderie; impoliteness; distant language; close language; rude situation; awkward situation

Full Text:

PDF

Downloadable G-Drive file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VlcZXnaiQ2B-07FUdr-lYsK-jjwUqMRb/view

References

Blog Dr. Faizal Risdianto: Academic Writing : Constructing New Insights, Stat...

Blog Dr. Faizal Risdianto: Academic Writing : Constructing New Insights, Stat...: Dear Netizens Bagi para mahasiswa baik  yang sedang mengambil studi di S1, S2, S3 dan para  Jihadis Jurnal yang sedang mempersiapkan arti...

Papers in the Journal of Pragmatics Research Vol 7 no. 1 (2025).

Dear all,

This is the newly published paper in the Journal of Pragmatics Research Vol 7 no. 1 (2025).

Articles
Learning by Gaming: Extramural English Gaming Effect on Indonesian Senior High Students' Pragmatic Competence
Muh Ilham Dirwan, Ni Wayan Sartini, Muhammad Zulfadhli
1-20 PDF
Abstract View: 207, PDF Download: 184

The Role of Technology in Facilitating the Acquisition of Pragmatic Competence in Online English Language Learning
Mezia Kemala Sari, Efri Yoni, Sri Ariani, Erlinda Syam, Fadila Rasyida
21-33 PDF
Abstract View: 69, PDF Download: 44

Social Semiotics "Masako Package”: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective
Nancy Natalia Dharmawan, I Ketut Suardana, Yoga Putra Semadi
34-53 PDF
Abstract View: 83, PDF Download: 32

Code Switching and Code Mixing in Denny Sumargo’s Podcast on Toxic Relationships
Karisma Tarigan, Yesika T. Girsang
54-85 PDF
Abstract View: 73, PDF Download: 72

Linguistic Reflections of Cultural Ethics: Social Assistance Discourse in Surakarta
Teisar Arkida, Fitri Anekawati, Wakit Abdullah Rais, 86-106 PDF
Abstract View: 43, PDF Download: 13

Strengthening Spiritual Representation Through Charles Sanders Peirce's Semiotic Analysis In The Song Gala Bunga Matahari
Rahma Fatiya, Dewi Kusumaningsih, Muhlis Fajar Wicaksana, Sri Wahono Saptomo, Hanisah Hanafi
107-131 PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Abstract View: 58, PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) Download: 22

The Analysis of Emojis and Identities In The Comments Section on Instagram @Ussfeed: From Semiotics to Cyberpragmatics
Muhamad Hilal, Ribut Wahyudi, 132-156

Maharani, F., Firdaus, D., & Sariyati, I. (2025). Turn-Taking Strategies in Happy Sad Confused: Crafting an Interactive and Engaging Talk Show Experience. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 7(1), 157–181. https://ejournal.uinsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/jopr/article/view/3737 

Tren Penelitian Terbaru Kajian Linguistik Pragmatik

 

Teori *impoliteness* oleh Jonathan Culpeper memang merupakan antitesis dari teori *politeness* dan *Cooperative Principle* yang didasarkan pada prinsip Gricean. Namun, relevansi teori ini dalam perkembangan linguistik pragmatik saat ini bergantung pada konteks penggunaannya dan fokus penelitian.

### **Teori Politeness dan Cooperative Principle**

- Teori *politeness* dan *Cooperative Principle* Grice (1975) telah menjadi dasar dalam studi pragmatik komunikasi. Prinsip ini berfokus pada efektivitas komunikasi melalui empat kategori maksim: kualitas, kuantitas, relevansi, dan cara[1][3].

- Teori *politeness* oleh Brown dan Levinson (1987) serta model oleh Leech (1983) memperluas prinsip Grice dengan menambahkan dimensi sosial seperti kesopanan dan strategi komunikasi untuk menghindari pelanggaran sosial[1][3].

- Dalam konteks budaya tertentu, seperti Indonesia, penerapan prinsip Grice sering kali disesuaikan dengan kebutuhan harmoni dan nilai budaya lokal[3].

### **Teori Impoliteness oleh Jonathan Culpeper**

- Culpeper memperkenalkan teori *impoliteness* sebagai cara untuk memahami pelanggaran norma kesopanan dalam komunikasi. Teori ini berfokus pada bagaimana ketidaksopanan digunakan secara strategis untuk mencapai tujuan tertentu, seperti mengekspresikan ketidaksetujuan atau konflik[1].

- Teori ini relevan dalam situasi komunikasi yang tidak kooperatif atau konflik sosial, di mana pelanggaran norma kesopanan menjadi alat komunikasi yang efektif.

### **Relevansi dan Perkembangan**

71 LIST OF RESEARCH ON IMPOLITENESS IN CYBERPRAGMATICS

1. Expression of Emotion As Impoliteness Markers In Instagram Comments Section In Indonesia: A Pragmatic Study , D. Suganda, S. Yuliawati, Nani Darmayanti, 2022. The paper analyzes impoliteness markers in Indonesian Instagram comments using pragmatic theories. It focuses on swear words, examining their form, reference, and impact.

1. Indonesian Netizens’ Impoliteness Toward Government Loudspeaker Policies: A Cyberpragmatic Approach, Tri Santoso, Endang Nurhayati, Margana, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2025. The paper analyzes impoliteness in Indonesian netizens' comments on a government policy, using a cyberpragmatic approach and Leech's impoliteness theory. It identifies deviations from maxims of wisdom, politeness, agreement, and sympathy.
2. Politeness and Impoliteness Strategies in Lecturer-Student Communication Within Cyberpragmatic Chats, Faizal Risdianto, M. Machfudz, 2023. The paper perfectly matches the criteria for impoliteness and cyberpragmatics. It analyzes impoliteness principles in online communication and uses a cyberpragmatic approach to study online interactions. It is somewhat relevant to the Indonesian language criterion as it examines communication in both English and Indonesian.
3. Impoliteness Strategy for Cyberbullying in Indonesian on Instagram Social Media, Subyantoro, Suseno, Zuliyanti, 2023. The paper analyzes impoliteness strategies in Indonesian cyberbullying speech on Instagram, identifying positive and negative impoliteness types. While relevant to cyberpragmatics through its discussion of impoliteness, it doesn't explicitly apply specific pragmatic frameworks.
4. HATE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA: INDONESIAN NETIZENS’ HATE COMMENTS OF PRESIDENTIAL TALK SHOWS ON YOUTUBE, Ismail Tahir, Muhammad Gana Fajar Ramadhan 2024. This paper analyzes hate speech in Indonesian netizens' comments on YouTube, focusing on impoliteness strategies. It identifies early warning as the most common type of hate comment. While it touches on digital communication and (im)politeness analysis, it does not explicitly apply specific pragmatic theories.
5. (Im)Politeness and (In)Civility in Social Media: The Case of Pronouns and Propositions in Twitter Comments, Aisah, 2020. This paper analyzes impoliteness and incivility in Indonesian Twitter comments using Culpeper's impoliteness theory and Papacharissi's incivility theory. It examines how pronouns and propositions are used to attack President Jokowi's positive face, finding that informal pronouns like "Lu/Loe" are considered impolite.
6. Impoliteness in Indonesian Language Hate Speech on Social Media Contained in the Instagram Account, Subyantoro Subyantoro, S. Apriyanto, 2020. This paper analyzes hate speech using impoliteness theory, identifying strategies like positive and negative impoliteness. The study focuses on Indonesian language hate speech found in Instagram comments. While it does discuss social media, it does not explicitly apply pragmatic theories.
7. Analysis Model of Impolite Indonesian Language Use, 2021. The paper analyzes impolite language use in Indonesian on social media, focusing on factors like context, power, diction, and ethical speech acts. It aims to develop a model for analyzing impoliteness. While it mentions social media, it does not explicitly apply pragmatic theories.
8. IMPOLITENESS STRATEGY IN INSTAGRAM CYBERBULLYING: A CASE STUDY OF JENNIFER DUNN POSTED BY @LAMBE_TURAH, Fani Indrawan, 2018. The paper perfectly matches the impoliteness and Indonesian language criteria, as it analyzes cyberbullying comments on an Indonesian Instagram account using Culpeper's impoliteness strategies. It is somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics, as it applies a pragmatic theory (impoliteness strategies) to online communication.

Jonathan Culpeper (2011) in Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence

 

Jonathan Culpeper adalah seorang ahli pragmatik dan linguistik yang dikenal atas kontribusinya dalam studi tentang impoliteness atau ketidaksopanan dalam bahasa. Melalui berbagai karyanya, terutama buku "Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence" (2011), Culpeper mengeksplorasi bagaimana ketidaksopanan digunakan sebagai alat komunikasi yang efektif untuk menyampaikan pesan tertentu.

Definisi dan Konsep Dasar

Ketidaksopanan, menurut Culpeper, merujuk pada perilaku komunikatif yang menarik evaluasi negatif dalam konteks tertentu dan menyebabkan pelanggaran atau ketidaknyamanan. Ini berbeda dari ketidaksopanan yang tidak disengaja atau ketidaktahuan terhadap norma sosial; ketidaksopanan sering kali bersifat disengaja dan strategis. Culpeper menekankan bahwa ketidaksopanan bukan hanya kebalikan dari kesopanan, tetapi memiliki dinamika dan fungsi tersendiri dalam interaksi sosial.

Strategi Ketidaksopanan

Dalam upayanya untuk menguraikan anatomi ketidaksopanan, Culpeper mengidentifikasi beberapa strategi utama yang digunakan individu untuk mengekspresikan ketidaksopanan:

Blog Dr. Faizal Risdianto: Best AI Research & Writing Assistants & mencari re...

Blog Dr. Faizal Risdianto: Best AI Research & Writing Assistants & mencari re...: link AI Research Assistants & mencari research gap and novelty link AI Research Assistants Perplexity Gemini (google.com) Cognosys Cha...

20 Most Cited papers in Journal of Pragmatics Research

On speech acts  IDP Wijana, Journal of Pragmatics Research 3 (1), 14-27 48 2021

An analysis of directive speech act found in “koi mil gaya” movie TN Fitria, Journal of Pragmatics Research 1 (2), 89-99 48 2019
Pragmatics principles of English teachers in Islamic elementary school  GR Pasaribu, SH Daulay, PT Nasution, Journal of Pragmatics Research 4 (1), 29-40 42 2022
Speech acts in EFL classrooms  D Christianto, Journal of Pragmatics Research 2 (1), 68-79 28 2020
Maxim of cooperative principle violation by Dodit Mulyanto in stand-up comedy Indonesia season 4
AUS Raharja, A Rosyidha,  Journal of Pragmatics Research 1 (1), 62-77 26 2019
The Analysis Of Politeness Strategey Used By The Main Character Of Novel “The Sun Also Rises”
W Widyastuti, Journal of Pragmatics Research 1 (2), 118-138 24 2019
The flouting maxim on twitter influencers’ tweets
N Hassani, Journal of Pragmatics Research 1 (2), 139-155 20 2019
Impoliteness of directive speech acts in online Indonesian language learning
LE Rahmawati, N Hidayat, A Kurniawan, Journal of Pragmatics Research 3 (2), 97-107 19 2021
Turn Taking in Mata Najwa Talk Show" Ragu-Ragu Perpu" Episode: A Conversational Analysis
F Habibi, DN Hidayat, A Alek, Journal of Pragmatics Research 2 (1), 80-96 19 2020
Persuasive Strategies in Selected Brand Products’ Advertisement on Instagram: Rationalization Aspect
TN Fitria, Journal of Pragmatics Research 3 (2), 108-130 17 2021
Impoliteness addressed to different genders and their responses in the Kitchen Nightmares, a TV reality show, AD Milal, AC Pramono
Journal of Pragmatics Research 3 (2), 131-146 14 2021
The problem of Presupposition in George Orwell’s Novella Animal Farm
F Risdianto, N Malihah, A Guritno, Journal of Pragmatics Research 1 (1), 1-12 13 2019
Internet analysis of figurative language in automotive advertisement slogans
K Atmaja, Journal of Pragmatics Research 4 (1), 18-28 12 2022
The use of Declaration of Illocutionary Acts of the Korean-English Drama “I Hear Your Voice”
E Sartika, S Marzuqoh, K Majid, Journal of Pragmatics research 1 (1), 30-42 12 2019
A cross-cultural pragmatics study of request strategies and politeness in Javanese and Sundanese
PA Chintawidy, NW Sartini, Journal of Pragmatics Research 4 (2), 152-166 10 2022
Hedges function in masculine and feminine feature’s language: a pragmatics analysis
DN Azizah, Journal of Pragmatics Research 3 (1), 59-69 9 2021
Pragmatic features of the speech act of compliment in a Turkish TV drama
MH Keshavarz, Y Çetereisi, G Asit, Journal of Pragmatics Research 2 (1), 1-25 9 2020
Discourse and power relations: A critical discourse analysis of a Pakistani talk Show
N Iqbal, KA Azhar, ZA Shah ,Journal of Pragmatics Research 2 (1), 26-40 9 2020
Cooperative principles at work: Unveiling EFL classroom interaction in AKM University through a sociopragmatic lens , R Oktaviabri, A Degaf, Journal of Pragmatics Research 5 (2), 190-219 8 2023
Speech acts found in English tourism slogans used in Indonesia
G Giyatmi, PI Astuti, R Wijayava, Journal of Pragmatics Research 3 (1), 70-85 8 2021